# Topics in Mathematics

**Algebra Curriculum**

**Focus
**

History of Algebra and Algebra Education

Definition of Algebra

NCTM Principles and Standards

Nebraska Algebra Standards

Typical United States Algebra Curriculum

**Discussion**

History of Algebra and Algebra Education

Algebra has been studied for many centuries. It can be traced back to the Babylonians,

ancient Chinese, and Egyptians. Algebra was in what is referred to as the “rhetorical”

stage. Problems were solved by the use of words and prose.

During the 3

^{rd}century, Diophantus of Alexandria (ca. 250) wrote the book Arithmetica.

All but six of the original thirteen parts have been lost. The surviving parts show that,

Diophantus interjected the use of symbols to represent unknowns into his work. This

ushered algebra into the syncopated stage. In Arithmetica, however, Diophantus solved

several practical problems and avoided any general procedures.

During the 5

^{th}and 6

^{th}centuries, many Indian and Arabic mathematicians became very

prominent. The first being Aryabhatta (ca. 475 – ca. 550), whose book of the same name,

Aryabhatta, dealt with work on linear and quadratic equations, and whose book

Brahmagupta presented the general solution to quadratic equations.

Al-Khwarizmi (ca. 825) was a 9

^{th}century Arabic mathematician that composed the book

al-Kitab al-muhtasur fi hasib al-jabr wa’l-muqabala (“Compendium on calculation by

completion and balancing” or “Science of cancellation and transposition”). If you

translate the translation of the title, you loosely get “Science of equations”. The book

produced a systematic consideration of algebra separate from number theory. It also

provided general solutions to several different types of quadratic equations. The Arabic

word “al-jabr”, that means completion, is the origins of the modern word “algebra”.

The 12

^{th}century witnessed the Persian mathematician, Omar Khayyam (ca. 1044 – ca.

1123), write a treatise on algebra. He followed Euclid’s (ca. 300 B.C.) axiomatic methods

in its development and made the distinction between arithmetic and algebra. Also during

the 12

^{th}century Al-Khwarizmi’s book was translated and made available to western

mathematicians.

During the next century, Leonardo Fibonacci provided many important contributions to

algebra. Fibonacci paved the way for others such as Luca Pacioli (1445-1517), Robert

Recorde (1510-1558), Scipione del Ferro (c. 1465-1526), and Ludovico Ferrari (1522-

1565).

Francois Viète (1540-1603) is credited with introducing the symbols that are used in

algebra. Algebra entered its last stage of development at this time; the symbolic stage.

Carl Friedrich Gauss (1777-1855) proved the Fundamental Theorem of Algebra in his

doctoral thesis. The Fundamental Theorem of Algebra was first proposed by Girard

(1593 - 1632) in 1629.

**Fundamental Theorem of Algebra:**Given a polynomial equation of degree n, there

exists exactly n solutions to the equation.

Modern day proofs of the theorem rely on complex analysis and the inclusion of complex

roots. The idea of complex roots was introduced sometime around the time of René

Descartes (1596 - 1650). It took some time for it to be fully accepted.

René Descartes is considered the “Father of Analytical Geometry” and is honored with

the rectangular coordinate system being named after him (the “Cartesian Plane”).

Geometric concepts are now described by equations and symbolic expressions.

The 19

^{th}and 20

^{th}centuries have seen algebra become much more abstract. Algebra no

longer includes only the theory of equations. It also involves game theory and matrices. It

is used as a common thread in calculus, discrete mathematics, probability and statistics,

and most other fields of mathematics, as well as in any discipline that has a quantitative

aspect to it. Algebra has been described as the language of science.

The National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (NCTM) describes algebra as being

“dynamic and a necessary vehicle for describing a changing world”.

Algebra education in my opinion has experienced two major influences. The first being

the School Mathematics Study Group project that resulted from panic in the United States

after the Russian launching of Sputnik. Prior to that, algebra instruction was based on the

prior work of the mathematicians previously mentioned. For example, in the early 1940s

Clemson University was using a college algebra textbook written by Rosenbach and

Whitman. In the front of the book, honor is paid to Robert Recorde (1510-1558) for his

influence on algebra. The book covers twenty topics and from a strictly symbolic point of

view. The topics are:

I. Fundamental Operations

II. Factoring and Fractions

III. Exponents and Radicals

IV. Functions and Their Graphs

V. Equations and Their Solutions

VI. Systems of Linear Equations

VII. Quadratic Equations

VIII. System of Equations Involving Quadratics

IX. Ratio, Proportion, and Variation

X. Progressions

XI. Mathematical Induction and Binomial Theorem

XII. Inequalities

XIII. Complex Numbers

XIV. Theory of Equations

XV. Logarithms

XVI. Interest and Annuities

XVII. Permutations, Combinations, and Probability

XVIII. Determinants

XIX. Partial Fractions

XX. Infinite Series

Granted this is a college text, therefore some of the topics listed were not covered in a

high school class and others were only briefly touched on in high school. The point is that

these are the topics that the greats wrestled with and wrote about. The methods used in

the text were more like a recipe than anything else.

**Laws of signs**

**1. To add two numbers of like signs**, add their absolute values and prefix

their common sign to the result.

**2. To add two numbers of unlike signs**, subtract the smaller absolute value

from the larger and …

No explanation provided!

After Sputnik was launched, the U.S. worried that the Russians were academically ahead

of us. To fight this, the School Mathematics Study Group (SMSG) was created under the

leadership of Edward Begle (1914 - 1978) of Yale University. A group of university

mathematics professors decided what topics should be covered in the kindergarten to

twelfth grade mathematics curriculum. The purpose of the curriculum was to prepare

students to go on to college and study mathematics, science, and engineering.

The SMSG had its successes and its FAILURES. The main affects on high school

algebra, the introduction of set theory, and field theory. Another very important overreaching

result was the publishing of the Mary Dolciani textbook series. This series

included Algebra: Structure and Method, probably the most popular and most used high

school algebra book. As the text ran through several editions, concepts such as matrices

and analytic geometry were introduced.

In the late 1980s and again in 2000, NCTM published sets of high school mathematics

standards. The early set is responsible for the standards-based education reform

movement. NCTM went about its task different than SMSG did, by including K-12

teachers, business representatives, community college instructors, university professors

and others in its discussions and deliberations. The result was a set of standards that was

applicable to and “reachable” by all students.

The NCTM identified the fundamental components of algebraic thinking as:

• Understanding patterns, relations, and functions

• Representing and analyzing mathematical situations and structures using

algebraic symbols

• Using mathematical models to represent and understand quantitative

relationships

• Analyzing change in various contexts

These concepts are inherent in most modern day middle/high school algebra textbooks.

Pedagogy based on Bruner’s and Piaget’s work is also present in most textbooks. The

NCTM encourages the use of manipulatives to build a solid base for mathematical

learning. Students must pass through all of Bruner’s three stages. Therefore, algebra

concepts are being presented earlier in the K-12 curriculum and the use of manipulatives

is occurring at all levels.

The movement to base curriculum, instruction, and assessment on clearly defined

standards forces one to rethink the way in which algebra is learned as well as taught.

Standards have placed the main emphasis on learning. We must emphasize the issues this

causes and think about “thinking mathematically”.

Algebra education (as well as any mathematics education) cannot be broken down into a

sequence of steps. Teacher development in algebra cannot be dominated by the “how-to”

mentality. Algebra education and teacher development must prompt deep and personal

reflection about learning. Learning algebra is constructive. Abstract concepts must be

grounded in previously learned less abstract concepts.

**Definition of Algebra**

Reviewing the history of algebra gives clues to the meaning of “algebra”. A common

perception is that algebra is the generalization of arithmetic. That is to say that 2+3 =3+2

is generalized as x+ y = y + x. The former is true for one static example, while the latter

is true for a more “general” dynamic situation. The letters are symbols used to represent a

set of values, rather than a constant.

Algebra is in the symbolic stage of its development. The symbolism used not only covers

representation of unknowns, but also covers operations and relations. The use of this

symbolism constitutes a language.

A perusal of history highlights the importance that equations and their solutions play in

algebra. The fundamental theorem indicates the importance of the role polynomials and

polynomial equations play in algebra. The names of the books written as well as the

authors tell us the importance of problem solving and equations.

Matrices and game theory, as well as other areas, are included in the study of algebra.

Algebra is no longer seen as a collection of rules and methods of doing mathematics.

Algebra is a process. Algebra is a systematic development. Your college studies in

algebra show that algebra is an axiomatic system just like geometry. Mentioning

geometry, analytic geometry is a major part of algebra. Analytic geometry is the marriage

of algebra and geometry.

So what is the definition of algebra?

NCTM Principles and Standards

The NCTM recommends that all five content strands be distributed over all grade levels.

But, as the illustration below shows, they are not evenly distributed. Algebra makes up

most of the recommended curriculum in grades 9-12. Algebra and geometry are the bulk

of the curriculum in grades 6-8. In the Principles and Standards, the NCTM proposes

proportionality as an integrative theme in the middle-grades mathematics program.

Facility with proportionality develops through work in many areas of the curriculum,

including ratio and proportion, percent, similarity, scaling, linear equations, slope,

relative-frequency histograms, and probability. The understanding of proportionality

should also emerge through problem solving and reasoning, and it is important in

connecting mathematical topics and in connecting mathematics and other domains such

as science and art.

Distribution of Content Standards by Grade Band

The NCTM recommendations for middle-grades mathematics have students learning

significant amounts of algebra and geometry throughout grades 6, 7, and 8. Moreover,

students will see algebra and geometry as interconnected with each other and with other

content areas in the curriculum. They will have experience with both the geometric

representation of algebraic ideas, such as visual models of algebraic identities, and the

algebraic representation of geometric ideas, such as equations for lines represented on

coordinate grids. They will see the value of interpreting both algebraically and

geometrically such important mathematical ideas as the slope of a line and the

Pythagorean relationship. They also will relate algebraic and geometric ideas to other

topics—for example, when they reason about percents using visual models or equations

or when they represent an approximate line of fit for a scatter-plot both geometrically and

algebraically. Students can gain a deeper understanding of proportionality if it develops

along with foundational algebraic ideas such as linear relationships and geometric ideas

such as similarity.

Students' understanding of foundational algebraic and geometric ideas should be

developed through extended experience over all three years in the middle grades and

across a broad range of mathematics content, including statistics, number, and

measurement. How these ideas are packaged into courses and what names are given to

the resulting arrangement are far less important than ensuring that students have

opportunities to see and understand the connections among related ideas. This approach

is a challenging alternative to the practice of offering a select group of middle-grades

students a one-year course that focuses narrowly on algebra or geometry. All middlegrades

students will benefit from a rich and integrated treatment of mathematics content.

Instruction that segregates the content of algebra or geometry from that of other areas is

educationally unwise and mathematically counterproductive.

As students move into high school the importance of algebra is to be amplified. But as in

middle school, the NCTM recommends that it not be taught in isolation from other areas

of mathematics and other disciplines. It recommends that a high school student’s

algebraic training prepare him/her for the “new calculus” taught in colleges and

universities.

ALGEBRA STANDARDS

Instructional programs from pre-kindergarten through grade 12

should enable all students to—

**Understand patterns, relations, and functions**

**Pre-K–2 Expectations:**

In pre-kindergarten through grade 2 all students should–

• sort, classify, and order objects by size, number, and other properties;

• recognize, describe, and extend patterns such as sequences of sounds and
shapes or

simple numeric patterns and translate from one representation to another;

• analyze how both repeating and growing patterns are generated.

**Grades 3–5 Expectations:**

In grades 3–5 all students should–

• describe, extend, and make generalizations about geometric and numeric
patterns;

• represent and analyze patterns and functions, using words, tables, and graphs.

**Grades 6–8 Expectations:**

In grades 6–8 all students should–

• represent, analyze, and generalize a variety of patterns with tables, graphs,
words,

and, when possible, symbolic rules;

• relate and compare different forms of representation for a relationship;

• identify functions as linear or nonlinear and contrast their properties from
tables,

graphs, or equations.

The study of patterns and relationships in the middle grades should focus on
patterns that

relate to linear functions, which arise when there is a constant rate of change.
Students

should solve problems in which they use tables, graphs, words, and symbolic
expressions

to represent and examine functions and patterns of change.

**Grades 9–12 Expectations:**

In grades 9–12 all students should–

• generalize patterns using explicitly defined and recursively defined
functions;

• understand relations and functions and select, convert flexibly among, and use

various representations for them;

• analyze functions of one variable by investigating rates of change,
intercepts, zeros,

asymptotes, and local and global behavior;

• understand and perform transformations such as arithmetically combining,

composing, and inverting commonly used functions, using technology to perform

such operations on more-complicated symbolic expressions;

• understand and compare the properties of classes of functions, including
exponential,

polynomial, rational, logarithmic, and periodic functions;

• interpret representations of functions of two variables .

High school students' algebra experience should enable them to create and use
tabular,

symbolic, graphical, and verbal representations and to analyze and understand
patterns,

relations, and functions with more sophistication than in the middle grades. In
helping

high school students learn about the characteristics of particular classes of
functions,

teachers may find it helpful to compare and contrast situations that are modeled
by

functions from various classes.

Represent and analyze mathematical situations and structures using algebraic

symbols

**Pre-K–2 Expectations:**

In prekindergarten through grade 2 all students should–

• illustrate general principles and properties of operations, such as
commutativity,

using specific numbers;

• use concrete, pictorial, and verbal representations to develop an
understanding of

invented and conventional symbolic notations.

**Grades 3–5 Expectations:**

In grades 3–5 all students should–

• identify such properties as commutativity, associativity, and distributivity
and use

them to compute with whole numbers;

• represent the idea of a variable as an unknown quantity using a letter or a
symbol;

• express mathematical relationships using equations.

**Grades 6–8 Expectations:**

In grades 6–8 all students should–

• develop an initial conceptual understanding of different uses of variables;

• explore relationships between symbolic expressions and graphs of lines, paying

particular attention to the meaning of intercept and slope;

• use symbolic algebra to represent situations and to solve problems, especially
those

that involve linear relationships;

• recognize and generate equivalent forms for simple algebraic expressions and
solve

linear equations

Working with variables and equations is an important part of the middle-grades

curriculum. Students' understanding of variable should go far beyond simply
recognizing

that letters can be used to stand for unknown numbers in equations.

**Grades 9–12 Expectations:**

In grades 9–12 all students should–

• understand the meaning of equivalent forms of expressions, equations,
inequalities,

and relations;

• write equivalent forms of equations, inequalities, and systems of equations
and solve

them with fluency—mentally or with paper and pencil in simple cases and using

technology in all cases;

• use symbolic algebra to represent and explain mathematical relationships;

• use a variety of symbolic representations, including recursive and parametric

equations, for functions and relations;

• judge the meaning, utility, and reasonableness of the results of symbol

manipulations, including those carried out by technology.

Fluency with algebraic symbolism helps students represent and solve problems in
many

areas of the curriculum. For example, proving that the square of any odd integer
is 1 more

than a multiple of 8 can involve representing odd numbers and operating on that

representation algebraically. Likewise, the equations in the figure below
suggest an

algebraic justification of a visual argument for the Pythagorean theorem. And
many

geometric conjectures—for example, the medians of a triangle intersect at a
point—can

be proved by representing the situation using coordinates and manipulating the
resulting

symbolic forms. Straightforward algebraic arguments can be used to show how the
mean

and standard deviation of a data set change if sample measurements are converted
from

square meters to square feet.

An algebraic explanation of a visual proof of the Pythagorean theorem

Students should be able to operate fluently on algebraic expressions, combining
them and

re-expressing them in alternative forms. These skills underlie the ability to
find exact

solutions for equations, a goal that has always been at the heart of the algebra
curriculum.

Even solving equations such as

requires some degree of fluency. Finding and understanding the meaning of the
solution

of an equation such as

calls for seeing that the equation can be written as a quadratic equation by
making the

substitution u = e^{2x}. (Such an equation deserves careful attention because one
of the roots

of the quadratic is negative.) Whether they solve equations mentally, by hand,
or using

CAS, students should develop an ease with symbols that enables them to represent

situations symbolically, to select appropriate methods of solution, and to judge
whether

the results are plausible.

Being able to operate with algebraic symbols is also important because the
ability to

rewrite algebraic expressions enables students to re-express functions in ways
that reveal

different types of information about them. For example, given the quadratic
function

f(x) = x^{2} – 2x – 3, some of whose graphical properties were discussed earlier,
students

should be able to reexpress it as f(x) = (x – 1)^{2} – 4, a form from which they
can easily

identify the vertex of the parabola. And they should also be able to express the
function

in the form f(x) = (x – 3)(x + 1) and thus identify its roots as x = 3 and x =
–1.

Use mathematical models to represent and understand quantitative relationships

**Pre-K–2 Expectations:**

In prekindergarten through grade 2 all students should–

• model situations that involve the addition and subtraction of whole numbers,
using

objects, pictures, and symbols.

**Grades 3–5 Expectations:**

In grades 3–5 all students should–

• model problem situations with objects and use representations such as graphs,
tables,

and equations to draw conclusions.

**Grades 6–8 Expectations:**

In grades 6–8 all students should–

• model and solve contextualized problems using various representations, such as

graphs, tables, and equations.

**Grades 9–12 Expectations:**

In grades 9–12 all students should–

• identify essential quantitative relationships in a situation and determine the
class or

classes of functions that might model the relationships;

• use symbolic expressions, including iterative and recursive forms, to
represent

relationships arising from various contexts;

• draw reasonable conclusions about a situation being modeled.

Analyze change in various contexts

**Pre-K–2 Expectations:**

In prekindergarten through grade 2 all students should–

• describe qualitative change, such as a student's growing taller;

• describe quantitative change, such as a student's growing two inches in one
year.

**Grades 3–5 Expectations:**

In grades 3–5 all students should–

• investigate how a change in one variable relates to a change in a second
variable;

• identify and describe situations with constant or varying rates of change and
compare

them.

**Grades 6–8 Expectations:**

In grades 6–8 all students should–

• use graphs to analyze the nature of changes in quantities in linear
relationships.

**Grades 9–12 Expectations:**

In grades 9–12 all students should–

• approximate and interpret rates of change from graphical and numerical data.

Nebraska Algebra Standards

The NEBRASKA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION ADMINISTRATIVE RULES

(TITLE 92, NEBRASKA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE) AS OF MAY 2005 provides the

curriculum requirements for the state K-12 schools in Rule 10, Section 4.

004 Curriculum and Standards

004.01 K-12 Curriculum. **Quality Indicator: The curriculum is comprehensive,
coordinated, and sequential and is directed toward locally approved goals and
standards for student learning. The instructional program focuses on
achievement and provides for the needs of all students including learners with
disabilities and high ability learners. It draws upon research, best practice,
and
reputable theory.**

004.01B By July 1, 2003, each school district either adopts measurable quality

academic content standards for reading, writing, mathematics, science, and social

studies/history that are the same as those found in Appendices A through D of this

Chapter or adopts local content standards approved by the Commissioner as equal to

or exceeding in rigor the standards in Appendices A through D of this Chapter. By

July 1, 2003, nonpublic schools have local academic content standards for reading,

writing, mathematics, science, and social studies/history approved by the local

governing body.

004.01C Districts electing not to adopt the state academic content standards submit

the local academic content standards to the Commissioner for approval as equal to or

exceeding in rigor the state standards according to at least one of the following

criteria.

• 004.01C1 The local standards contain the same content organized in a different

way.

• 004.01C2 The local standards include more components of a content area. An

example would be mathematic standards that include vectors, which is a

component of algebra, which is not covered in Appendices A through D of this

Chapter.

• 004.01C3 The local standards cover more content areas in a subject. An example

would be mathematic standards that include the content area of fractals, which is

the study of repeated patterns, which is not covered in Appendices A through D

of this Chapter.

Middle School Curriculum

004.03A3 Mathematics. The curriculum includes practice in numeration,

computation, estimation, problem solving, geometry/spatial concepts, and

measurement. It introduces algebraic and statistical concepts and provides

opportunities for students to develop understanding of the structure of mathematics.

High School Curriculum

004.04B3 Mathematics - 40 instructional units. The curriculum includes

communicating, reasoning, problem solving, numeration, computation, estimation,

measurement, geometry, data analysis, probability and statistical concepts, and

algebraic concepts.

The state of Nebraska has based its mathematics standards on those of the NCTM. The

Nebraska Mathematics Standards (NMS) includes four benchmark years (e.g. end of first

grade, end of fourth grade, end of eighth grade and end of twelfth grade). The NMS are

broken into process standards and content standards. The process standards are divided

into the following:

• Problem Solving

• Mathematical Communication

• Mathematical Reasoning

• Mathematical Connections

• Mathematical Representation

The content standards are divided into the following strands:

• Numeration/Number Sense

• Computation/Estimation

• Measurement

• Geometry/Spatial Concepts

• Data Analysis, Probability, and Statistical Concepts

• Algebraic Concepts

The Algebraic Concepts category contains three or four standards per benchmark grade.

Refer to the copy of the NMS provided.

Typical United States Algebra Curriculum

K-12 Algebra instruction in the U.S. tends to follow a standardized curriculum. The

curriculum for the most part follows that described by Dolciani in her popular textbooks.

Dolciani is no longer publishing. Ron Larson from Penn State University at Erie, is the

lead author for Houghton Mifflin’s most popular algebra series. This series replaced

Dolcini’s.

A quick perusal of the Algebra 1 book shows the content divided into

1. Connections to Algebra

2. Properties of Real Numbers

3. Solving Linear Equations

4. Graphing Linear Equations and Functions

5. Writing Linear Equations

6. Solving and Graphing Linear Inequalities

7. Systems of Linear equations and Inequalities

8. Exponents and Exponential Functions

9. Quadratic Equations and Functions

10. Polynomials and Factoring

11. Rational Equations and Functions

12. Radicals and Connections to Geometry

A quick perusal of the Algebra 2 book shows the content divided into

1. Equations and Inequalities

2. Linear Equations and Functions

3. Systems of Linear Equations and Inequalities

4. Matrices and Determinants

5. Quadratic Functions

6. Polynomials and Polynomial Functions

7. Powers, Roots, and Radicals

8. Exponential and Logarithmic Functions

9. Rational Equations and Functions

10. Quadratic Relations and Conic Sections

11. Sequences and Series

12. Probability and Statistics

13. Trigonometric Ratios and Functions

14. Trigonometric Graphs, Identities, and Equations

Skimming a typical section such as Section 6.2 of Algebra 1, shows that the book is still

very exercise based. There are problems (tasks), but the majority of the text is comprised

of exercises and an emphasis on symbolic manipulation.

Refer to the sample unit provided.

In recent years integrated mathematics curriculums have been emerging. A very good

example is the Core-Plus Mathematics Project (published as Contemporary Mathematics

in Context). Scanning through the contents of Course 1 (Freshman Mathematics) you see

seven units:

1. Patterns in Data

2. Linear Models

3. Patterns of Change

4. Graph Models

5. Patterns in Space and Visualization

6. Simulation Models

7. Exponential Models

Each unit consists of four to five lessons. The lessons are centered about meaningful,

applicable investigations that are problematic. Problematic means that the investigations

promote learning by building on previous knowledge and avoid repetitious exercises that

concentrate on isolated concepts.

The course integrates algebra and functions, statistics and probability, geometry and

trigonometry, and discrete mathematics. Each investigation involves more than one of

these categories at a time. Algebra of course is a common thread throughout all lessons.

Refer to the sample unit provided.